| SEO utility for software developers |
Why Articles Are Not The Route To High Search EngiYou have permission to publish this article electronically or in print, free of charge, as long as: 1. You must leave the article and resource box unedited. The copyright information and bylines MUST be left intact. 2. None of the links or content are removed or changed 3. The links in the author's resource box are live and hyperlinked when publishing to the web. Please also forward a copy of the URL where you have posted this article. 4. You do not use it in e-mail promotions that do not conform to federal law. 5. You send a copy of your ezine, newsletter, or the website link where the article is reproduced, to the author at: mailto:contact@priyashah.com If you do not agree to this, please do not publish this article. _______________________________________________ Make money with this article You can join the affiliate program at: http://www.geniusguides.com/affiliate.htm and use your affiliate link in the resource box at the end of the article _______________________________________________ Article Summary: If you have any interest in getting high search engine rankings for your website you've probably been sold the idea that writing and publishing your own articles will do it for you. Here's why that's not entirely true. Why Articles Are Not The Route To High Search Engine RankingsCopyright 2004 Priya Shah If you have any interest in getting high search engine rankings for your website (and who doesn't) you've probably been sold the idea that writing and publishing your own articles will do it for you. Here's why that's not entirely true. Imagine the following scenario... You write an article around a keyword or keyphrase you want to rank well for. You submit that article to all the article submission sites and directories and ezines you can find. Your article gets published in hundreds of places. You now have hundreds of links pointing back to your main site... But your own site never shows up in the top ten results for that particular keyword or keyphrase. Instead you find that there are lots of other sites carrying your article that rank better than yours. You've completely missed out on an excellent opportunity to get high rankings for your keyword or keyphrase. Even worse... you just handed your precious keyword-rich content on a platter to possible competitors who happened to publish your article on their website, and may have lost some of your most targeted visitors and sales to them. So where did you go wrong? Your mistake lay in using your precious article - the keyword-rich content you toiled for hours to write - for entirely the wrong purpose. You failed to use the power of the medium of article publishing to give your site an unbeatable advantage over others. Here's how to use your articles the right way to boost your search engine rankings. 1. Publish Unique Content On Your Website When you make an article available for reprint, the article, by virtue of it being published on hundreds of other sites, now no longer qualifies as unique content. In the eyes of search engines, those pages with higher Pagerank (and hence greater importance) than yours will now rank better than you for the keywords your article is optimized for. Instead of making your article the main course, use it as an appetizer to direct search engines and readers to a UNIQUE, keyword-rich, well-optimized report or white paper on your website, and you'll see dramatically different results. 2. Use Your Article As Spider Bait Think of your articles as simply the conduit that leads search engines to your website. Publishing your articles all over the web is like leaving scraps for a puppy (a.k.a. the search engines) that follows them all the way back to the kennel (a.k.a. your website) where it can feast on the main course - your UNIQUE content. 3. Use Keyword-Rich Anchor Text In Your Resource Box Use your main keyword or keyphrase in the anchor text of the article resource box that contains a link pointing back to your unique content. This will create hundreds of keyword-rich links pointing back to the well-optimized report on your website, and give your pages a powerful edge over other websites. Often this factor alone is sufficient to take your website to the top of the search results, especially with search engines like Google and MSN. The guidelines above include few of the steps you need to take to get high rankings for the keywords of your choice. Priya Shah is author of the search engine optimization ebook, Number One In Your Niche, that shows how to use your articles and content to get long-term, top ten rankings for your website. http://www.NumberOneInYourNiche.com About the Open Directory ( DMOZ)Getting a website listed in the Open Directory can be very frustrating. We know that being listed will probably help our Google rankings, but getting in can take a very long time. In this article I will explain why it often takes so long and why what you do when submitting your site is sometimes the cause of the delay. But first I will explain what the Open Directory is and why it is worthwhile for websites to be listed in it. What is the Open Directory?Advert: Training coursesWant to learn more about about usability, accessibility or CSS? Why not come on one of our excellent training courses:
Courses are held every month in London and are taught by usability and accessibility professionals. The Open Directory, also known as DMOZ, is a large, categorized directory of websites and pages, which is staffed by volunteers. Every website and page that is added to the directory has to be manually reviewed before it is included. Being listed in the directory is free. Not many people actually use the Open Directory for searches in the same way that Yahoo! is used, so the directory itself is of little value in generating traffic. However, its data can be freely downloaded, and any website, however small, can use it. One not so small website that downloads and uses the Open Directory`s data is Google. In fact, Google`s directory is the downloaded Open Directory. This has some significant effects for websites that are listed in the Open Directory. PageRank is an integral part of Google`s ranking algorithm, and higher PageRank helps towards higher rankings. The PageRank within a website is increased by pages from other sites linking to it, and the higher the PageRank of the pages that link to it, the better it is for the receiving site. A listing in the Open Directory creates two significant links into a website - one from the Open Directory (Google spiders the Open Directory just like any other site) and one from the Google directory. Both of these usually have decent PageRank. Then add the links from the thousands of small sites that have downloaded and use the Open Directory directory, and you can see why it is usually quite beneficial for a website to be listed. Simply being listed in the Open Directory can take a website from a Toolbar PageRank value of three to four, and even from four to five. Why does it take so long to get listed?At the time of writing, the front page at the Open Directory states ‘57,251 editors’ (volunteers who review and add websites to the directory), but this is misleading. They don`t in fact have that many editors, or anywhere near that many. That number is the total number of editors that they have had since the project started. Most of them are no longer editors. Of the ones that are still editors, a significant proportion of them are not actually active or are only slightly active. So the number of editors who are actively reviewing and adding websites is relatively small. On the other side of the equation, there is a massive backlog of sites waiting to be reviewed. Each editor can only edit in his or her own categories. Some editors have small categories with very few submissions to deal with, and they can be dealt with very quickly. Others are simply overwhelmed by the mountain of unreviewed sites, and there is little chance of getting through them in the near future. But the huge backlog, and the relatively low number of active editors, are not the only reasons why websites seem to wait forever to get listed. Many times, the delay is the fault of the person who submitted the website. Imagine that someone submits a site to a category that is reasonably close to what the site is about, but the site really belongs in a different category. What happens? The submission waits in the unreviewed queue of the category to which it was submitted. Sooner or later its turn comes and the editor reviews it, but finds that it belongs in a different category. That editor can`t edit the other category, so the submission is passed along to the other category, where it is added to the unreviewed queue. It doesn`t jump the queue just because it has already waited in a different queue. Eventually its turn will come again and it will be reviewed - again. That`s the simple course of events when a site is submitted to the wrong category. In practise, though, it is often significantly different. When the first editor reviews the site, often quite a long time after it was submitted, and finds that it doesn`t belong in the category, what is s/he likely to think? "If you can`t be bothered finding the right category for it, neither can I". And so the site is often sent to a category that is closer to where it belongs but not necessarily to the exact one. The editor there eventually gets to it, and sends it a bit further towards the right one - maybe to the right one this time, and maybe not - and the delays mount up just because the person who submitted the site didn`t take enough time to make sure that it was submitted to the right category in the first place. If the submitter can`t be bothered, why should anyone else be all that bothered? So, when submitting a site, always take time to find the right category for it. Don`t be tempted to submit it to a category that is higher up the tree than it belongs, because it won`t be accepted there and, doing so, could cause unnecessary, self-induced delays. Why are some sites rejected?The Open Directory`s policy is to include sites that have unique content, which means that many sites don`t qualify for inclusion. Among the sites that are likely to be rejected are those that have too much content of an affiliate nature. Some affiliate content is acceptable but when it occupies too much of a site, then the site will probably be rejected. Another reason why a site may be rejected is because of the submission. If the Title and Description provided in the submission don`t follow the Open Directory`s guidelines, then some editors will think, "If you can`t be bothered to spend a little time on it, why should I bother rewriting it for you?", and reject the site. Personally, I find it hard to believe that editors would do that, but I`ve heard of it happening. So, when submitting a site, read and follow the guidelines. The description is intended to give people an objective statement of what can be found in the site, and not to promote it. People are not informed that their site has been rejected, and there must be many people out there who think their submissions are still pending when, in fact, they`ve already been rejected. There`s only one way to know the status of a submission and that`s to get someone on the inside to tell you. Fortunately, there`s a place where you can do that. It`s the Open Directory Public Forum, which is run by some of the editors. They are very helpful in that they will find out the state of play for a website`s submission. If it`s been rejected, they will tell you, and they will usually give you the reason. Sometimes they will even review a long-delayed submission, but only if the particular category has no editor or the category`s editor has shown no signs of doing any editing in quite some time. About the Open Directory editorsAs I mentioned earlier, there are not many active editors when compared to the number shown on the Open Directory`s front page, but most of those that are active are keen. They are keen to add websites that have unique content, and keen to improve the directory; in fact, they remind me of a colony of ants busying themselves in and around their anthill (the directory), building it up, each tiny bit by each tiny bit. Contrary to what some people think, they do care about the directory and about adding new sites, but they have an uphill struggle because there aren`t enough of them. This article was written by Phil Craven. Phil knows an awful lot about search engine optimisation. What next?
Republish our search engine optimisation articlesAll our search engine optimisation articles are available for republishing, provided the author bio and links in the bio remain intact. You can also use our RSS news feed to republish all of our search engine optimisation articles. SEO articles index
|
||